Rankings Center 2.0
Best States for Financial Safety
State-level financial safety blends regional cost burden, claim frequency, and consumer-protection strength into a single resilience-of-household-finance metric.
Ranking (Financial Safety Score)
- 1.Vermont99
- 2.Maine98
- 3.New Hampshire98
- 4.Idaho97
- 5.Iowa96
- 6.Indiana95
- 7.North Dakota95
- 8.Ohio95
- 9.Wisconsin95
- 10.Alaska94
- 11.Hawaii94
- 12.Minnesota94
- 13.Montana94
- 14.North Carolina94
- 15.Oregon94
- 16.South Dakota94
- 17.Utah94
- 18.Virginia94
- 19.Washington94
- 20.Wyoming94
- 21.Alabama93
- 22.Illinois93
- 23.Massachusetts93
- 24.Pennsylvania93
- 25.Tennessee93
- 26.West Virginia93
- 27.Delaware92
- 28.Arizona91
- 29.Connecticut91
- 30.Kentucky91
- 31.Colorado90
- 32.Maryland90
- 33.New Jersey89
- 34.New Mexico89
- 35.District of Columbia88
- 36.Georgia87
- 37.Arkansas86
- 38.Mississippi86
- 39.Nebraska86
- 40.Missouri85
- 41.South Carolina85
- 42.Nevada84
- 43.Rhode Island83
- 44.New York77
- 45.California74
- 46.Kansas72
- 47.Michigan70
- 48.Texas66
- 49.Florida63
- 50.Oklahoma61
- 51.Louisiana59
Methodology
- Composite of state cost index, friendliness composite, and risk-event frequency
- Friendliness composite derives from cost, risk, and consumer protection
- Personal household decisions are excluded — this is the state environment
- Methodology re-validated annually
Key findings
- Low-cost, low-risk states dominate the top quartile
- Financial-safety friction is concentrated in high-cost coastal markets
- Consumer-protection strength provides a structural lift across cost basis
- Bottom-quartile states require deeper household-side compensating action